I’m lovin’ it.
Food that is.
Fast food, slow food, healthy food and – of course – the not so healthy kind.
But how much love does the food industry have for us?
That’s the question Food, Inc. sets out to answer.
Directed by Robert Kenner and nominated in the Documentary Feature category at this years Oscar’s, Food, Inc. is an investigation into the modern methods used by the American food industry.
And the consequences this has on every level of this food chain.
It starts out with that paragon of culinary expertise in the west; McDonald’s.
Back in the fifties, the McDonald brother’s came up with an ingenious idea for their restaurant’s; the application of factory line techniques to the way they made food.
Ingenious for them and their profit margins, less so for their employees and customers.
Those McDonald boys realised that by making their kitchen staff responsible for a single part of making a hamburger, they could do away with skilled workers and save money.
Not only that, they managed to reduce the power of their employees at a stroke.
When a job consists of repeatedly doing something very simple, it’s easy to train almost anyone to do this.
And replacing them is just as simple.
There’s no doubting the business acumen in this idea and the McDonald’s were savvy enough to pass on some of these savings to their customers, which only served to accelerate their popularity.
Of course, no one really needs to be told that fast food is bad for you anymore.
Thanks to Morgan Spurlock, not to mention that sixth sense we all commonly misplace, only the most poorly educated soul could claim ignorance of the negative effects fast food has on our health.
What people may not be as aware of is that the food industry took note of the commercial success these factory line restaurants enjoyed and adopted the very same principles to the way they produce food.
Food, Inc. sets about lifting the veil on these practices, which the food industry has spent a lot of money trying to conceal.
And for the most part, it does so in a creditable way.
The consequences for animals, employees and consumers are brought to light in a harrowing yet sober depiction of industrialised food practices.
Ironically, it’s when Food, Inc. tries to give a human face to the consequences of an industry obsessed with technology that it feels heavy handed and loses a little resonance.
As with most documentaries, it’s heavy on the talking heads format that can feel a little samey after a while.
But not all film is designed to entertain.
And when a topic as worthy of discussion as that presented in Food, Inc. is brought to the table, it’s hard to begrudge a little sermonising in the spirit of education.
The overwhelming message of Food, Inc. is clear; the industrialisation of the way we consume food is has been engineered to financially benefit wealthy food suppliers to the detriment of all other aspects of our food chain.
Whether that’s the animals, the workers, us – the consumers – or our very planet itself.
Ok, that’s pretty depressing.
So here’s the good news; we get to choose whether to keep this system or not.
Because the food industry is more interested in money than anything else, they will change when we stop buying their products.
But not before.
So support organic food and your local farmers markets that place the welfare of animals, the land and you above making as much profit as they possibly can.
That’s an idea I’m lovin’ right now.
For more information about the issues raised by this film, click here.






Sam
2 years, 8 months ago
I saw this film for the first time after I had read Pollan’s Omnivore’s Dilemma. While they discuss much of the same material, I found it interesting that OD was ordered from industrial food -> industrial organic -> Polyface, whereas Polyface was directly juxtaposed to the industrial food system in Food, Inc. I feel the ordering in Food Inc., more effectively shows industrial organic as a better, but not that much butter, improvement to the industrial food system. This flows nicely with the end of the movie, emphasizing the influence of consumers over the food system (Walmart execs openly admit that they are only stocking organic foods at the requests of their consumers). I wish the film had dove deeper into the connection between our elected officials and the food industry – is there anyone voters can oust? Will this make a difference? What attempts have been made before?